Danny Santiagos Famous All Over Town :: Famous All Over Town

Danny Santiago's Famous All Over Town  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚      When I was little I remember driving across country, going to Florida, and past neighborhoods that were anything but mine. They had old houses that looked like they were going to fall down any minute, real trashy looking. In Colorado, my house was nice and always kept up. I sat in the car wondering what kind of people lived in those run down places and what they were like. The answers came to me years later when I read the book, Famous All Over Town, by Danny Santiago. The main character, Chato, is a young Hispanic boy living in a neighborhood like the ones I saw when I was little. After reading the book, although I never thought I would have anything in common with people who lived like that, I learned that Chato and I have do have similarities, but we have more differences. There aren't very many similarities between Chato and I, but there is one, and it's a big one. We both have families that love us. Lena, Chato's sister takes care of him after he gets home from the hospital. Then he begins to think about his family and how glad he is to be home. "Lena loved me, my mom loved me, and my father loved me, it seemed" (45). All of Chato's family loves him and he loves being with them. In my house, you would find the same kind of environment and I can relate to some of Chato's family life. However, Chato's family is not always nice to him. His family has many problems, such as everyone keeping secrets from each other and everyone lieing to each other. For example, Chato's father is having an affair and everyone knows about it, but they all keep it from Chato. When he finds out he is very mad at himself and things he is dumb for not knowing, while everyone else does. "She knew, they knew, the whole damn town knew, except only dumb, stupid me" (l46). In my fa mily, however, everyone is honest and you would never see anyone keeping something that important from the others. Another example of how Chato's family is different, is shown when Chato is having a bellyache and his father things that he is faking it. He tells him, "Shut-up, crybaby-coward" (26). His father is not being very nice to him because he is sick.

Contradictions on the “Tell-Tale Heart’ by Edgar Allen Poe Essay

 §One contradiction that the perceptive reader catches is the following. The narrator first tells us that he spies on the old man at night. He eerily stares at the old man while he sleeps: â€Å"It took me an hour to place my whole head within the opening so far that I could see him as he lay upon his bed† (Poe 291). This clearly implies that the narrator can see his future victim: â€Å"I could see him as he lay upon his bed.† But then the narrator tells us that although the victim awakes startled, the narrator simply stood his ground in the doorway since â€Å"His room was as black as pitch with the thick darkness†¦and so I knew that he could not see the opening of the door†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Poe 292). This implies that the room and hallway are pitch black, which means that neither the victim nor the predator can see anything – without light. So the narrator can both see and not see his victim. This carefully concealed contradiction shows that the narration itself is unstable, just as the narrator’s mind is.  §Another contradiction can be found in the second paragraph of the story. The narrator says, â€Å"It is impossible to say how first the idea entered my brain† (Poe 290). This suggests that the narrator was clueless as to how he thought up of the idea of killing the old man. It is saying that it was not his decision, and implying that he was never thinking about it. Later in the paragraph though, he says â€Å"by degrees–very gradually–[he] made up [his] mind to take the life of the old man† (Poe 290). This contradicts the previous quote. First, he says that it was not his decision, but in the latter quote, the narrator tells the audience that â€Å"[he] made up [his] mind to take the life of the old man.† Surely, even the narrator himself was confused.  §The narrator says that when he was spying on the old man, he â€Å"thrust in [his] head† (Poe 291). By definition, thrust means to push or drive quickly and forcibly. The reader gets an image of the narrator passing through the threshold abruptly. For â€Å"cunningly [he] thrust it in† (Poe 291). The next line contradicts this statement for he says he â€Å"moved it slowly–very, very slowly, so that [he] might not disturb the old man’s sleep† (Poe 291). Now, the reader sees an image of the narrator peeking through gradually and quietly, so that the waking of the old man could be avoided. In fact, he did  it so slowly that â€Å"it took [him] an hour to place [his] whole head within the opening† (Poe 291). Taking an hour to put a head through a doorway truly is a long time, indicating that he could not have thrust his head through the doorway. Thrusting his head in to spy on the old man and doing it â€Å"very, very slowly† very m uch contradicts each other.  §The narrator describes what the old man is feeling and thinking of when he was startled at the eighth night. â€Å"His fears had been ever since growing upon him† (Poe 292). One can picture the old man very afraid, not knowing what to do. Contrastingly, the narrator says that the old man â€Å"had been saying to himself–‘It is nothing but the wind in the chimney–it is only a mouse crossing the floor†¦it is merely a cricket which has made a single chirp'† (Poe 292). It seems as if the old man is saying this with confidence, and without fear. This implies that the old man is not scared at all. He does not even worry for he believes that it is nothing but merely a noise created by nature. Additionally, the narrator says that the old man â€Å"had been trying to comfort himself with these suppositions† (Poe 292). Now, the narrator goes back in saying that the old man is in fact scared, for he is trying to find comfort. The narrator basica lly said that the old man is scared, then not scared, and finally, scared again.  §The narrator speaks of the eye of the old man that bothered him. He describes it as â€Å"a dull blue, with a hideous veil over it† (Poe 293). He describes it as if it is something weak, without strength, for it cannot even tell when a beam of light is on it, as the narrator did every night, for eight consecutive nights. Near the end of the story, the narrator says that it is something else, again a contradiction. â€Å"No human eye–not even his–could have detected any thing wrong† (Poe 294). This indicated that there is a power that the eye possesses. If a normal human eye, already with great â€Å"power,† could not detect anything wrong, surely a dull eye with â€Å"a hideous veil over it† cannot do any better. The narrator though gives power to the eye because he puts the old man’s eye in a higher position than that of a normal human eye. Even the emphasis on the word â€Å"his† through the means of italics says that the narrator is saying that the eye holds power. Irrational human drives such as obsession, paranoia, the desire to destroy and other mental psychoses such as these cannot be rationally explained. It is quite complicated and even an in depth analysis of these themes is close to impossible. One cannot really explain someone’s obsession, simply because no one knows what is actually going on in the obsessed mind, other than the obsessed himself. It is unlikely that I would be able to explain the very brain activity of the obsessed. Even if I ask questions or experiment on him, I would not be able to comprehend it all. Similarly, attempts of discovering the foundation of paranoia are difficult. Perhaps it is the many factors that contribute to this. In the end, it all leads to in depth analysis that would only uncover irrational and illogical reasons as to how one became paranoid, as it also is with how one became obsessed. The narrator of the story attempts to redeem himself by saying that he is not a madman. In explaining everything, he believes that he is in fact rational. The story, though, full of contradictions, proves that the narrator is unstable, and all the explanations in the world could not unravel the mysteries of obsession and paranoia.

Ammunition over Guns Essay - 1708 Words

The Bill of Rights has stood for centuries as the ultimate embodiment of the rights of citizens in America, and the right to keep and bear arms is a vital part of the individual rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Gun control, or even a ban, infringes upon this fundamental freedom of America’s constitutional law. Furthermore, the problems being targeted are not problems, and the technology being discredited, ludicrous. Finally, gun control proponents base their arguments on fearful statistics, whereas statistics, in reality, favor less restrictive arms bans. Argument has always erupted over the exact interpretation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution. The amendment flew through Congress in 1791, and promptly ratified by the†¦show more content†¦The Supreme Court ruled in the Opinion of the Court that â€Å"arms† refer to firearms, and that restricting technologies developed since its adoption constitutes an unconstitutional action, and more so, the militia composition includes all able bodied citizens (the Supreme Court called it a â€Å"citizen militia,†) (SC 7-8, 23) . This militia is to be â€Å"well regulated† but the Court found this to simply mean â€Å"well trained,† not regulated by strict regulation (SC 23). In short, while this ruling found that the right to bear arms is an individual right, every able bodied man makes up the aforementioned collective. The Court continued to make an attempt at defining which guns were protected under the 2nd amendment, ruling specifically that handguns are legal under the amendment, along with rifles, shotguns, and most modern firearms (the Court struck down the notion that only antiquated arms are protected) (SC 8). Thus, the Supreme Court not only found gun rights to be an extensive right. While the right is extensive, as the Supreme Court has found, it is not all encompassing as Presser v Illinois has found. All members on both sides of the issue agree that the use of guns for violence constitutes a heinous act by those responsible; the Supreme Court has ruled that the right to arms does not apply if intended for semi-military or violent use in Presser v Illinois (â€Å"Presser v Illinois†). In short, the ability to own guns, and a wideShow MoreRelatedAurora Shooting Response Paper1183 Words   |  5 Pagesof Rounds online†, addresses an absence of laws regulating the sale of ammunition. Jack Healy is a rocky mountain correspondent for the New York Times, and has reported on the war in Iraq from Baghdad. Healys article elicits good emotional engagement with the reader, but it is fundamentally lacking sound logical arguments and ethical credibility. Aurora shooting suspect James Holmes purchased a 6,000 rounds of ammunition prior to the shooting in Aurora Colorado. Holmes purchased bullet ¬Ã‚ ¬proofRead MoreThe Debate On Owning A Gun Control1409 Words   |  6 PagesToday, the debate on owning a gun has many sides: there are many positives and negatives that come into play when talking about gun control. Gun control is a very controversial issue, however, with the right prevention steps one could relax knowing that the situation is finally being addressed. Most citizens have the right to have a gun other than felons. Felons have no rights to a gun and can not own or have one in their possession. Many people have their own feeling on guns on if they should have toRead MoreGun Control and Mass Shootings1442 Words   |  6 Pages Gun Control The occurence of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting of December 14, 2012, in Newtown, Connecticut. The gunman, was 20-year-old Adam Lana, who first shot and killed his mother at their Newtown home. He then drove to Sandy Hook Elementary School where he fatally shot 20 children and 6 adult staff members. As first responders arrived, Lana committed suicide by shooting himself in the head. The shooting began at approximately 9:30 a.m. Sandy Hook was the deadliest mass shooting atRead MoreThe Invention Of A Flint Lock1377 Words   |  6 PagesFrom the iconic AK-47 to the lesser know guns have been with man since the 10th century when the Chinese invented the fire lance (â€Å"Jeff Harder†). A simple hollow tube made of bamboo or metal loaded with gunpowder and shrapnel that would be fired. Later on in the 13th century the first cannons were in production and used by European countries (â€Å"Jeff Harder†). Following the invention of a flint lock in the 15th century guns similar to those used in the French and Indian Wars were produced (â€Å"Jeff Harder†)Read MoreGun Control in the United States1306 Words   |  6 Pages Gun Control in the United States has gone out of control. The United States should enforce laws to not allow any guns in a house hold in order to reduce violence and crime in the country. Reducing the rate of crime in the United States, controlling big weapons, taxing ammunition, and gun collection can help make this happen. Gun Control can make this country a safer environment to live in. Gun Control has obviously gone out of control in the recent years. Look around, they are everywhere. ReducingRead MorePersuasive Essay On Gun Control1242 Words   |  5 Pageshis dad, they’re both ecstatic, the dad experiencing all the skills he has taught his son over the years finally pay off, and killing his first deer with the same gun he used thirty years ago. The first firearm was made 653 years ago in 1364, to fire the gun, you had to hold a burning wick to a touch hole to ignite the powder, causing an explosion which sends the projectile out of the barrel. Since then, guns have evolved tremendously, in Germany, 1885, the first semi automatic handgun was made, allowingRead MoreWhy Gun Control Is Bad793 Words   |  4 PagesGun Control Argumentative Essay All guns have the potential to be dangerous and should be handled with care. Guns have been part of American life for as long as people can remember. For most people guns are perceived as very dangerous and harmful. However, that is not true; guns can be dangerous, but only if they are in the wrong hands. Owning a gun is right that every American should be able to take pride in having. Guns are used for self-defense, hunting, law enforcement and other uses.Read MoreGuns, Ammunition And Its Negative Effects On Society944 Words   |  4 PagesIssue Question: can the availability of guns, ammunition and its negative effects on society be a thing of the past? Claim: An analysis of the United State gun culture reveals their negative effects on society. Thesis paragraph: In the wake of recent killings and mass shooting in sandy hook and other locations across the country and communities, there has been public cries for the need for stricter gun laws and regulations. Gun violence has become a major problem facing the country. Day inRead MoreA Report On The Sub Machine Gun1208 Words   |  5 Pageswound from Victim 2 imply the bullet can be easily fragmented. The Heckler and Koch MP7 sub machine gun with 4.6 x 30mm frangible SX ammunition coincides with this evidence, especially with the accompanying accessories; a HK MP7 Silencer and Brasscatcher, which further benefits the shooter by creating minimal disturbance and leaving negligible ballistic evidence behind. Weapon: The sub machine gun Heckler and Koch MP7 has convincing specifications that correspond with the evidence left behind atRead MoreEditorial Board : End The Gun Epidemic Essay1084 Words   |  5 PagesEditorial Board. End the Gun Epidemic In America†. New York Times. New York Times.com, 5 December 2015. Web. 11 Nov. 2016 In â€Å"End the Gun Epidemic in America† the Editorial Board of the New York Times argues that politicians are not doing enough to keep American’s from purchasing specifically designed weapons for killing people. Politicians let their political interests interfere with passing basic restrictions on weapons of mass killings. The article was written in response to the December 2, 2015